About note for vote case and Babu

Online News Portal
About note for vote case and Babu
- Advertisement -

A lot is talked about the Vote for Note case in the Telugu states. Some say that there is an understanding between Chandraabu and Chandrasekhar Rao over the issue. Some others said that the TS Government is now not so serious to fix Chandrababu Naidu in this case. But the case continues.

The Hyderabad High Court on Thursday commenced hearing on a criminal petition moved by AP Chief Minister N. Chandrababu Naidu challenging an order passed by the ACB Court ordering a probe into the role of other accused in the cash-for-vote scam.

The ACB court has earlier directed the TS ACB to probe the role of other accused in the case based on a complaint of YSR Congress MLA Alla Ramakrishna Reddy.

A single judge of the High Court stayed the order of ACB Court. When Mr Ramakrishna Reddy moved the Supreme Court against the stay, the Apex Court had remanded the matter to the High Court requesting it to dispose of the case within four weeks.

images

Supreme Court senior counsel Siddhartha Luthra, appearing for Mr Naidu before Justice T. Sunil Chowdary, told the court that despite knowing that the law does not permit issuance of a second FIR in the same case, the special court granted an order for the fresh probe under Section 156 (3) of the CrPC.

Relying on the judgment of the Supreme Court in T.T. Anthony versus state of Kerala, the senior counsel submitted that despite pendency of the investigation of other accused in the case and also the fact of filing of charge sheet against some of the accused in the case, the special court, without going into the facts of the case, just issued the order under the Section 156 (3).

revanth

He submitted that while quashing case against one Jerusalem Mathaiah, one of the accused in this case, the High Court categorically ruled that the charges of abetment of corruption would not be attracted against accused in this case as the alleged abetment was not related to an official functioning but is related to an election.

There is a wide spread opinion that the corruption was not related to the officials and it is related to an election matter where corruption has become a common feature. There are politicians who agree that without note there is no vote. These days people are coming out in open and demanding money to go for voting.

- Advertisement -